MedSysEvidence-graded reference

MedSys / Brain health

Brain health

Cognitive decline is not simply a matter of time passing — and almost none of what is sold for brain health is on the list of things that change it. The plain-English version.

The short version

Cognitive decline is not simply a matter of time passing. Around 45% of dementia cases worldwide are associated with factors that can in principle be changed, and the largest of them are the same things this site spends most of its time on: blood pressure, cholesterol, hearing, movement, smoking, alcohol, sleep.

And almost none of what is sold for brain health is on that list. The gap between the two is what this topic is about.

Where the effort is best spent

Ordered by how much difference it makes across a population, which is not the order these appear in when the subject comes up.

WhatRoughly how muchWhere it is covered
Hearing loss, treated7% of cases — joint largest, and aids are free on the NHSDementia risk
Raised LDL in midlife7% — joint largest, and added to the list only in 2024Cholesterol
Education, and staying mentally active5% — largely structural, and largely decided earlyDementia risk
Social contact5% — real, hard to intervene on, easy to underrateDementia risk
Blood pressure from midlifeThe vascular cluster as a whole dominates, and hypertension leads it for strokeBlood pressure
Depression, treated3%Dementia risk
Head injury, avoided3%Dementia risk
Air pollution3%Air pollution
Not smoking2% of dementia cases — low here only because UK smoking prevalence is now low. It remains the largest single lever for overall mortalityVaping & smoking
Physical activityModerate, and the only thing here with a randomised structural brain findingExercise and the hippocampus
Sleep, and treating apnoeaModerate, with the direction of causation genuinely unsettledSleep and the glymphatic evidence
Vision, and having the cataract doneAbout 2%, and among the easiest to act onDementia risk
AlcoholModerate, and the safe-level story has changedAlcohol
Staying socially connectedReal, hard to intervene on, easy to underrateDementia risk
Diet patternSmaller than the above, and it is the same pattern as for the heartEating for the heart
SupplementsSmallest of anything on this table, and one of them has real trial evidenceThe supplement claims

The percentages are the Lancet Commission's 2024 population attributable fractions — the share of dementia cases associated with each factor across a whole population, assuming causality and complete elimination. An earlier version of this table put smoking first and said the gap was “not close”. That was wrong for this question. Smoking leads the all-cause mortality table this one was modelled on; for dementia specifically it is 2%, because so few people in the UK now smoke. The correction is recorded here rather than made silently.

Five caveats, because a table like this invites more precision than it can carry. A population attributable fraction is not your personal risk reduction, and it is population-level and therefore nobody's personal order. The magnitudes are not additive and not independent — blood pressure and LDL act partly through the same vessels. The bands are orders of magnitude rather than effect estimates. And any source giving you days-gained figures for these is inventing precision that does not exist.

Two errors, and most people make one of them

The first is believing it is settled at birth and nothing helps. Twenty years ago dementia was widely presented as bad luck. The direction of the evidence has changed substantially since, and the change is genuinely new information rather than a shift in fashion.

The second is believing a capsule will do it. The brain-health supplement market is large, the mechanisms it advertises are frequently real, and the outcomes it implies have mostly never been tested. In 2026 a very large trial of a genuinely promising drug moved the biomarkers and changed nothing, which is the clearest demonstration yet of how far a plausible mechanism can travel without arriving.

If you are here because something feels wrong

Forgetting names and losing words is extremely common at every adult age, and much more so when you are tired, stressed, or in your forties and fifties.

  • If you are a woman in midlife, the pattern has a well-described cause and an unexpectedly reassuring evidence base. Start at Menopause and cognition.
  • If it is new, progressive, or other people have noticed it, that is a GP conversation rather than a reading exercise. Thyroid disease, B12 and iron deficiency, sleep apnoea, depression and alcohol all present this way, all are common, and all are treatable.
  • If a relative's memory has changed, the useful information is what has changed and over what period — not a score. The dementia chapter sets out what is known about risk and what the new drugs can and cannot do.

What this topic will not do. It will not give you a brain age, score your cognition, or sell you a protocol. It grades what is claimed, says which studies were done in mice, and points at the small number of things that are worth the effort. Several of those live in other topics on this site, and this page links to them rather than restating them, because two pages on one subject drift apart.